WARNING: PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND NOT INTENDED TO BE TAKEN AS SPECIFIC LEGAL
ADVICE.
FOR ADVICE REGARDING A PARTICULAR SITUATION, ALWAYS CONSULT WITH AN ATTORNEY
be granted by a court, the legality of this Japanese extra-judicial divorce is uncertain when its
validity is attacked or questioned in a state court. However, the U.S. Navy and other federal
agencies, such as Social Security Administration, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and
Department of State, accept the certificate of acceptance of report of mutual consent divorce as
valid documentation to prove dissolution of marriage to a Japanese citizen.
PROS: Easy, fast, and least expensive.
CONS: There will be no formal agreement on child support or division of marital assets unless the
parties enter into a separation agreement. Some U.S. federal agencies or state agencies may not
recognize child custody arrangements made by the mutual consent divorce.
Divorce by Mediation in Family Court (chotei rikon): This type of divorce can be obtained
regardless of the citizenship of the parties. Both parties must attend a mediation session and
agree to all terms of the divorce for the family court to grant the divorce petition. Once a judge
grant the divorce, the court will issue a record of mediation, which has the same effect as a
judgement. If both parties are from the same U.S. state, the Japanese family court will apply that
state’s substantive law to the divorce. For example, if both parties are residents of VA, they must
satisfy the statutory period of separation before the family court grants the divorce petition. If
the parties are residents from different U.S. states or countries, Japanese law would apply to all
aspects of the divorce.
PROS: Parties receive a “judicial divorce,” i.e., divorce granted by a court. Parties can agree to the
terms of divorce, including amount of child support and division of marital assets. All or some of
these terms may be acknowledged and enforced in the U.S.
CONS: A Japanese court order can only be enforced against properties in Japan. It cannot be used
to garnish pay that comes from DFAS or U.S. sources. It cannot divide military retirement. An order
from a U.S. court is required to enforce monetary obligations against members or divide military
retirement. Also, in cases where Japanese law is applicable, one parent must be designated as a
sole custodial parent. Joint custody cannot be awarded under Japanese law.
Contested Divorce in Family Court (“Litigation”) (shimpan rikon): If a party does not agree to
divorce through the abovementioned mediation process, a Judge may grant the divorce petition
upon finding grounds for divorce. Japan has very distinct grounds for divorce. Consulting with a
Japanese attorney is the best way to learn the likelihood of a court granting a divorce in your case.
PROS: Parties may still be able to get divorced even when the mediation fails.
CONS: Lengthy, expensive, and requires a Japanese attorney.
A list of Japanese attorneys can be found here: https://japan2.usembassy.gov/e/acs/tacs-
lawyers-naha.html